Decision Analysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DECISION ANALYSIS
Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2008, pp. 76-87
DOI: 10.1287/deca.1080.0113
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baillon, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Eliciting Subjective Probabilities Through Exchangeable Events: An Advantage and a Limitation

Aurélien Baillon

Department of Applied Economics, Erasmus University, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
baillon{at}few.eur.nl

Two events are exchangeable for an agent when she is indifferent to permutations of their outcomes. Such events are thus revealed to be equally likely. If they are complementary, the subjective probability associated with each event should be 1/2 (assuming the additivity of the probability measure). This paper reports the results of an experiment that elicits probabilities through exchangeable events. The experiment shows that this method does not suffer from source dependence, i.e., the preference for betting on some events based on knowledge about the mechanism that generates them. However, it also highlights how additivity might be violated. This paper deduces the practical implications of these results.

Key Words: subjective probability; elicitation; source of uncertainty; support theory; event-splitting effect
History: Received on November 16, 2007. Accepted on April 27, 2008.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
L. R. Keller, M. Baucells, J. C. Butler, P. Delquie, J. R. W. Merrick, G. S. Parnell, and A. Salo
From the Editors...
Decision Analysis, December 1, 2008; 5(4): 173 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
L. R. Keller and K. M. Kophazi
From the Editors...
Decision Analysis, June 1, 2008; 5(2): 57 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by INFORMS.