Decision Analysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DECISION ANALYSIS
Vol. 4, No. 4, December 2007, pp. 211-226
DOI: 10.1287/deca.1070.0098
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by French, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ruggeri, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

e-Participation and Decision Analysis

Simon French, David Rios Insua, Fabrizio Ruggeri

Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, M15 6PB, United Kingdom
Statistics and Operations Research, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, E 28933 Madrid, Spain
National Research Council, Institute of Applied Mathematics and Information Technology, I-20133 Milan, Italy

simon.french{at}mbs.ac.uk
david.rios{at}urjc.es
fabrizio{at}mi.imati.cnr.it

Decision analytic methods are being increasingly used to help to articulate and structure debate and deliberations among citizens and stakeholders in societal decisions. Methods vary, but, essentially, a public authority or agency, when faced with a significant set of issues, may organise one or more workshops with stakeholders and citizens as participants. Such methods of public engagement and participation are, by and large, conducted face to face. However, the advent of the World Wide Web brings the possibility of conducting citizen and stakeholder interactions in a distributed, possibly asynchronous fashion. In this paper we discuss the challenges that have to be addressed and overcome if such e-participation is to be a valid tool within a modern democracy. The difficulties are many and varied, but the pressures towards e-government, and better regulation in general, mean that such methods will be used in the near future. Thus, we outline a program of research and debate in which we believe that the professional decision analysis community should engage.

Key Words: decision analysis; decision conference; deliberative democracy; e-democracy; e-participation; facilitation; negotiation analysis; public participation; stakeholder workshops
History: Received on September 25, 2007.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
L. R. Keller
From the Editor...
Decision Analysis, September 1, 2009; 6(3): 121 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
L. R. Keller
From the Editor...
Decision Analysis, March 1, 2009; 6(1): 1 - 3.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
R. F. Bordley
Combining the Opinions of Experts Who Partition Events Differently
Decision Analysis, March 1, 2009; 6(1): 38 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.