Decision Analysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DECISION ANALYSIS
Vol. 3, No. 3, September 2006, pp. 163-176
DOI: 10.1287/deca.1060.0075
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baucells, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rata, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

A Survey Study of Factors Influencing Risk-Taking Behavior in Real-World Decisions Under Uncertainty

Manel Baucells, Cristina Rata

IESE Business School, Avenida Pearson, 21, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Ramon Trias Fargas 25-27, 08005 Barcelona, Spain

mbaucells{at}iese.edu
cristina.rata{at}upf.edu

With the goal of investigating decision making under uncertainty in real-world decisions, we conduct a survey requiring 261 subjects to describe a recent real-life decision and to answer questions about several dimensions of such decision, including reference-dependence, domain, the default alternative, and the type of consequences. We confirm a key prediction of prospect theory, namely, that perceiving the sure outcome as a loss increases risk-taking behavior. Such perception of losses also increases the attractiveness (perceived probabilities and estimated consequences) of the risky option. The results also confirm that the domain (professional versus private) of a decision is a factor influencing risk-taking behavior. Risk-taking behavior does not vary across the three groups considered (undergraduates, MBA students, and executives) and does not depend on the type of consequences (monetary or not). We confirm that reference-dependence, and not the default alternative, is the driver of risk-taking behavior.

Key Words: real-world decisions; risk-taking behavior; reference-dependence; domain; default alternative; type of consequence
History: Received on October 13, 2005. Accepted on August 5, 2006.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
L. R. Keller
From the Editor...
Decision Analysis, September 1, 2009; 6(3): 121 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
P. Bromiley
A Prospect Theory Model of Resource Allocation
Decision Analysis, September 1, 2009; 6(3): 124 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
L. R. Keller and K. M. Kophazi
From the Editors...
Decision Analysis, June 1, 2009; 6(2): 53 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
L. R. Keller
From the Editor...
Decision Analysis, September 1, 2007; 4(3): 111 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.