Decision Analysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DECISION ANALYSIS
Vol. 2, No. 1, March 2005, pp. 17-29
DOI: 10.1287/deca.1050.0031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merrick, J. R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Analysis of Correlated Expert Judgments from Extended Pairwise Comparisons

Jason R. W. Merrick, J. Rene van Dorp, Amita Singh

Department of Statistical Sciences and Operations Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 843083, 1001 West Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23284
George Washington University, 1776 G. Street, NW, Washington, DC 20052
George Washington University, 1776 G. Street, NW, Washington, DC 20052

jrmerric{at}vcu.edu
dorpjr{at}gwu.edu
amitas{at}gwu.edu

We develop a Bayesian multivariate analysis of expert judgment elicited using an extended form of pairwise comparisons. The method can be used to estimate the effect of multiple factors on the probability of an event and can be applied in risk analysis and other decision problems. The model, which parallels Bayesian models for combining expert judgments, provides predictions of the quantity of interest that incorporate dependencies among the various experts. In this form we may learn about the dependencies between the experts from their responses. The analysis is applied to a real data set of expert judgments elicited during the Washington State Ferries Risk Assessment. The effect of the statistical dependence among experts is compared to an analysis assuming independence among them.

Key Words: expert judgment; pairwise comparisons; Bayesian statistics; multivariate analysis
History: Received on July 15, 2004. Accepted on January 23, 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
L. R. Keller
From the Editor...
Decision Analysis, March 1, 2008; 5(1): 1 - 4.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
L. R. Keller
From the Editor...
Decision Analysis, September 1, 2007; 4(3): 111 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
L. R. Keller
From the Editor...
Decision Analysis, June 1, 2007; 4(2): 47 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
S. Hoffmann, P. Fischbeck, A. Krupnick, and M. McWilliams
Elicitation from Large, Heterogeneous Expert Panels: Using Multiple Uncertainty Measures to Characterize Information Quality for Decision Analysis
Decision Analysis, June 1, 2007; 4(2): 91 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by INFORMS.