Decision Analysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DECISION ANALYSIS
Vol. 1, No. 1, March 2004, pp. 26-31
DOI: 10.1287/deca.1030.0012
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hämäläinen, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Reversing the Perspective on the Applications of Decision Analysis

(Comment on Keefer et al. 2004)

Raimo P. Hämäläinen

Helsinki University of Technology, Systems Analysis Laboratory, P.O. Box 1100, 02150 HUT, Helsinki, Finland
raimo{at}hut.fi

This paper looks into the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) of the field of the applications based on DA techniques; focusing especially on MAVT. The need for best practices and bias-resistant analysis procedures is pointed out. In most application papers there are no reports on the verification or testing of the procedures used. The Internet provides great opportunities in the delivery of DA software and e-learning material. Public sites such as Decisionarium (www.decisionarium.hut.fi) provide encouragement and a low entry level to try value tree analysis in new applications. There are also great opportunities in reaching out the other MCDA communities such as AHP practitioners. Today the need and demand for decision support is perhaps growing most rapidly in environmental problems. A clear trend is also the integration of DA into GIS and other models. Many of the applications are now published in non-OR/MS subject area journals.

Key Words: DA applications; software; Internet; environment; multiple models
History: Received on April 8, 2003. Accepted on May 13, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
J. Wallenius, J. S. Dyer, P. C. Fishburn, R. E. Steuer, S. Zionts, and K. Deb
Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead
Management Science, July 1, 2008; 54(7): 1336 - 1349.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by INFORMS.